linux-kernel - Re: netlink: GPF in sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iLR=LHwHO=69Aw=VAe0yN2R19CHpy8DmsiGs9EE-vOw+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2016 08:17:43 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo

CC Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following program triggers GPF in sock_sndtimeo:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/c19cadd309791cf5cb9b2bf936d3f48d/raw/1743ba0211079a5465d039512b427bc6b59b1a76/gistfile1.txt
>
> On commit 16ae16c6e5616c084168740990fc508bda6655d4 (Nov 24).
>
> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN
> Dumping ftrace buffer:
>    (ftrace buffer empty)
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 19950 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.9.0-rc5+ #54
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> task: ffff88002a0d0840 task.stack: ffff880036920000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff86cb35e1>]  [<     inline     >] sock_sndtimeo
> include/net/sock.h:2075
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff86cb35e1>]  [<ffffffff86cb35e1>]
> netlink_unicast+0xe1/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232
> RSP: 0018:ffff880036926f68  EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000068 RBX: ffff880036927000 RCX: ffffc900021d0000
> RDX: 0000000000000d63 RSI: 00000000024000c0 RDI: 0000000000000340
> RBP: ffff880036927028 R08: ffffed0006ea7aab R09: ffffed0006ea7aab
> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed0006ea7aaa R12: dffffc0000000000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff880035de3400 R15: ffff880035de3400
> FS:  00007f90a2fc7700(0000) GS:ffff88003ed00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00000000006de0c0 CR3: 0000000035de6000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
>  ffff880035de3400 ffffffff819f02a1 1ffff10006d24df4 0000000000000004
>  00004db400000014 ffff880036926fd8 ffffffff00000000 0000000041b58ab3
>  ffffffff89653c11 ffffffff86cb3500 ffffffff819f0345 ffff880035de3400
> Call Trace:
>  [<     inline     >] audit_replace kernel/audit.c:817
>  [<ffffffff816c34b9>] audit_receive_msg+0x22c9/0x2ce0 kernel/audit.c:894
>  [<     inline     >] audit_receive_skb kernel/audit.c:1120
>  [<ffffffff816c40ac>] audit_receive+0x1dc/0x360 kernel/audit.c:1133
>  [<     inline     >] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214
>  [<ffffffff86cb3a14>] netlink_unicast+0x514/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1240
>  [<ffffffff86cb46d4>] netlink_sendmsg+0xaa4/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1786
>  [<     inline     >] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621
>  [<ffffffff86a6d54f>] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x110 net/socket.c:631
>  [<ffffffff86a6d8bb>] sock_write_iter+0x32b/0x620 net/socket.c:829
>  [<     inline     >] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:499
>  [<ffffffff81a6f24e>] __vfs_write+0x4fe/0x830 fs/read_write.c:512
>  [<ffffffff81a70cf5>] vfs_write+0x175/0x4e0 fs/read_write.c:560
>  [<     inline     >] SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:607
>  [<ffffffff81a75180>] SyS_write+0x100/0x240 fs/read_write.c:599
>  [<ffffffff81009a24>] do_syscall_64+0x2f4/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:280
>  [<ffffffff88149e8d>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> Code: fe 4c 89 f7 e8 31 16 ff ff 8b 8d 70 ff ff ff 49 89 c7 31 c0 85
> c9 75 25 e8 7d 4a a3 fa 49 8d bd 40 03 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <42>
> 80 3c 20 00 0f 85 3a 06 00 00 49 8b 85 40 03 00 00 4c 8d 73
> RIP  [<     inline     >] sock_sndtimeo include/net/sock.h:2075
> RIP  [<ffffffff86cb35e1>] netlink_unicast+0xe1/0x730
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232
>  RSP <ffff880036926f68>
> ---[ end trace 8383a15fba6fdc59 ]---


Looks a bug added in commit 32a1dbaece7e37cea415e03cd426172249aa859e
("audit: try harder to send to auditd upon netlink failure")
or 133e1e5acd4a63c4a0dcc413e90d5decdbce9c4a ("audit: stop an old
auditd being starved out by a new auditd")

Richard, can you take a look ?

Thanks !