[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1480183585-592-7-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:05:52 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/39] mtd: nand: denali: fix write_oob_data() function
The function write_oob_data() performs write access to the spare
area, so passing "false" to the 3rd argument (transfer_spare) of
denali_send_pipeline_cmd() is weird.
Actually, the transfer_spare is ignored for MAP10 operation with
SPARE_ACCESS (0x41), so this change has no impact on the hardware
behavior. Yet, we should keep our code to make sense.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
index 61e1e33..b2b050b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int write_oob_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, int page)
denali->page = page;
- if (denali_send_pipeline_cmd(denali, false, false, SPARE_ACCESS,
+ if (denali_send_pipeline_cmd(denali, false, true, SPARE_ACCESS,
DENALI_WRITE) == PASS) {
write_data_to_flash_mem(denali, buf, mtd->oobsize);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists