linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] tpm: replace dynamically allocated bios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161126125425.nsi5h2wqsmciwgxu@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2016 14:54:25 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:     Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@....de,
        tpmdd@...horst.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] tpm: replace dynamically allocated bios_dir with
 a static array

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:38:13PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:08:38AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> > > This is no good at this point in the series - we need the ENODEV
> > > detection in tpm_chip_register() from the 'Fix handle of missing event
> > > log' moved into this patch, because it now returns ENODEV due to
> > > sercurityfs
> > 
> > Sure it would be cleaner but not really necessary. Do you really think
> > this is mandatory? No matter how I reorder patches this will require
> > time and effort to fix various merge conflicts because of the replacemnt
> > of event log. After that I have to test everything.
> 
> Well, once you started editing patches to fix them you should make
> them fully correct so bisection works.
> 
> If you applied the patch I gave you on top of the tree then I would
> have said to leave it...

I agree with you on this. I adjusted it to be like that now. Is it good
now?

/Jarkko