linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161127175241.ojvqnla4zn5mkg63@thunk.org>
Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:52:41 -0500
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dedekind1@...il.com,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, jaegeuk@...nel.org, david@...ma-star.at,
        wd@...x.de, sbabic@...x.de, dengler@...utronix.de,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, mhalcrow@...gle.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:18:12AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> 
> Do you want us to address Eric's review comments on top of the fscrypt
> branch or shall we rebase?
> I'd suggest the former.

Yes, let's address them on top of the existing fscrypt branch.  I
don't consider any of his comments super-serious --- they were mostly
documentation or comments level changes unless I missed something.

	      	 	  		       - Ted