[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b1d18df-7b5d-9f18-ff70-7f62fecd8718@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:20:40 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>,
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
Bed??icha Ko??atu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] MAINTAINERS: Add device tree bindings to
mv88e6xx section
Am 28.11.2016 um 00:14 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:46:16PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Also include the netdev list for convenience, as done elsewhere.
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>
> Hi Andreas
>
> In future, please include any signed-off-by, tested-by, reviewed-by,
> etc you have received for a previous version of a patch. Only drop
> them if you make significant changes to the patch, invalidating them.
... which is what I already fixed in v3 and apologized.
Unfortunately only after that I noticed that netdev got dropped after
you asked me to place Dave in To.
Since essentially you are telling me you don't want further DT patches
for the Omnia's chip that would get CC'ed via MAINTAINERS, I'll stop
resending here and will leave it to you to get CC'ed on patches touching
your files.
>
> For a second time:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Thanks,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists