linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.8.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:14:22 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 4.8.11

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> [    0.332919] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
> [    0.340902] IP: [<          (null)>]           (null)
> [    0.346063] PGD 0 
> [    0.348181] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP
> [    0.351364] Modules linked in:
> [    0.354526] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.8.11+ #1
> [    0.360582] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M4A77T, BIOS 2401    05/18/2011
> [    0.369589] task: ffff88022e120bc0 task.stack: ffff88022e124000
> [    0.375549] RIP: 0010:[<0000000000000000>]  [<          (null)>]           (null)
> [    0.383139] RSP: 0018:ffff88022e127eb8  EFLAGS: 00010297
> [    0.388497] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [    0.395675] RDX: ffff88022f002880 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: ffff88022f0028a0
> [    0.402853] RBP: ffffffff81d00e13 R08: fffffffffffffffe R09: ffff88022f002880
> [    0.410027] R10: 00000000700117a0 R11: 00000000dc161723 R12: ffff880237c16780
> [    0.417204] R13: ffffffff81c0b9c0 R14: ffffffff81817cc0 R15: ffff88022e120040
> [    0.424382] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    0.432521] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [    0.438308] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c06000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [    0.445484] Stack:
> [    0.447544]  ffffffff81000410 ffffffff81c3c300 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [    0.455210]  0000000000000008 ffffffff81968f9c ffffffff810690c8 0000000000000000
> [    0.462865]  000000000000a080 ffffffff81d94310 0000000000000001 ffff880237c16780
> [    0.470544] Call Trace:
> [    0.475836]  [<ffffffff81000410>] ? do_one_initcall+0x40/0x150

Booting with initcall_debug might give us some info.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.