[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <982d633b-e9c4-0f10-052b-e324f094d0f5@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:32:36 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@...escale.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, P L Sai Krishna <lakshmis@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a .platform_init callback to sdhci_arasan_ops
+Sai for Xilinx perspective.
On 25.11.2016 16:24, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using the Arasan SDHCI HW IP, there is a set of parameters called
> "Hardware initialized registers"
>
> (Table 7, Section "Pin Signals", page 56 of Arasan "SD3.0/SDIO3.0/eMMC4.4
> AHB Host Controller", revision 6.0 document)
>
> In some platforms those signals are connected to registers that need to
> be programmed at some point for proper driver/HW initialisation.
>
> I found that the 'struct sdhci_ops' contains a '.platform_init' callback
> that is called from within 'sdhci_pltfm_init', and that seems a good
> candidate for a place to program those registers (*).
>
> Do you agree?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> (*): This has been prototyped on 4.7 as working properly.
> However, upstream commit:
>
> commit 3ea4666e8d429223fbb39c1dccee7599ef7657d5
> Author: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 20 10:56:47 2016 -0700
>
> mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Properly set corecfg_baseclkfreq on rk3399
> ...
>
> could affect this solution because of the way the 'sdhci_arasan_of_match'
> struct is used after that commit.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists