[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <919b5b47-5634-d144-3643-d0c97972aaa7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:23:49 +0000
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Compact userptr object backing store
allocation
On 14/11/2016 11:45, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 11/11/2016 08:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
>>
>> Userptr backing store with SWIOTBL active is currently allocated in
>> the same
>> inefficient manner, with one sg entry per object page, as what the commit
>> 871dfbd67d4e ("drm/i915: Allow compaction upto SWIOTLB max segment
>> size") fixed
>> for regular GEM objects.
>>
>> We can fix that by adding new a __sg_alloc_table_from_pages core
>> function which
>> allows us to control the maximum desired coalesced segment size.
>>
>> Other than that the series starts with two simple fixes to
>> sg_alloc_table_from_pages which deal with incorrect data type usage and a
>> theoretical overflow condition. Fixing the latter enables easy
>> addition of the
>> above mentioned __sg_alloc_table_from_pages.
>>
>> Tvrtko Ursulin (4):
>> lib/scatterlist: Fix offset type in sg_alloc_table_from_pages
>> lib/scatterlist: Avoid potential scatterlist entry overflow
>> lib/scatterlist: Introduce and export __sg_alloc_table_from_pages
>> drm/i915: Use __sg_alloc_table_from_pages for userptr allocations
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 15 +----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 28 ++-------
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/rapidio/devices/rio_mport_cdev.c | 4 +-
>> include/linux/scatterlist.h | 11 ++--
>> lib/scatterlist.c | 78
>> ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 7 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> I have three patches to lib/scatterlist.c in this series which has all
> been reviewed and tested.
>
> We would like to merge them via the DRM tree if there are no objections?
Excuse me for the re-ping - still looking for an ack to merge these few
patches via the drm tree. (The code in question does not have a
designated maintainer.)
Regards,
Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists