[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161128115413.GW3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:54:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation/atomic_ops.txt: convert to ReST
markup
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:08:55AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> - use *foo* (for italics) or **foo** (for bold) instead of _foo_;
That's daft, and also you're wrong. The normal convention is:
/italic/
*bold*
_underlined_
> :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/serial-console.rst <serial_console>`
That seems to work, as in 'gf' doesn't get confused by the spurious
characters attached. Is there any way to enforce that?
> - if you have something that you want to use a monotonic font on
> PDF/LaTeX/HTML, use ``foo``.
Bit weird, somewhere in the typewriter age they invented the " symbol so
we didn't have to type double quotes anymore.
> - if you use special characters like '*' in the middle of the text
> (outsize a literal block), prepend with a \ in order to escape
> parsing it.
That's a bit inconvenient I suppose.
> Btw, a lot of editors recognize ReST files and are capable of
> parsing the ReST tags while displaying the file, including vim
> and emacs, using different colors and/or bold to display those tags.
> So, even for text-editing, converting to ReST brings improvements.
Doesn't seem to really work though; if I open
Documentation/development-process/1.Intro.rst the :ref:s at the start of
the document don't work with the regular 'follow-ref' key combo of ^].
Powered by blists - more mailing lists