lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hLm0eAvo-_M4Ossrsn96VZ99ZNhT+ETCzB=s+ekCpGEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:45:47 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/10] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 17:06, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>

[cut]

> Hi Rafael,
>
> The first version of this series was sent on 4th of October and its been
> ~2 months now that this series is getting reviewed. All of the stuff has
> already been seen by Stephen and others.
>
> Mark had some particular concerns in V3, which I discussed with him
> over IRC and resolved. The DT bindings are already Acked by Rob
> and Stephen otherwise.
>
> Will it be possible to get this merged for 4.10-rc1, as no one has raised
> any objections so far? Looks like Stephen is a bit busy at the moment,
> and is unable to review stuff for now.
>
> I don't want to get this delayed by another merge cycle. If there are any
> shortcomings reported later by others, I can always go fix them very
> quickly.

OK, let's see how this goes.

I guess I'll apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446545/ too, then.

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ