linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:58:46 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:39:54PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:

SNIP

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4368a481251d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +#ifndef _TIME_UTILS_H_
> +#define _TIME_UTILS_H_
> +
> +struct perf_time {
> +	u64 start, end;
> +};

hum, it's more interval rather than 'time'
would perf_interval, perf_time_interval suit better?

thanks,
jirka