[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d22926d-e892-e824-4bee-a52b4945f9ed@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:04:15 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...driver.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
Andrei Pistirica <Andrei.Pistirica@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: macb: ensure ordering write to re-enable RX
smoothly
Le 28/11/2016 à 14:55, Zumeng Chen a écrit :
> When a hardware issue happened as described by inline comments, the register
> write pattern looks like the following:
>
> <write ~MACB_BIT(RE)>
> + wmb();
> <write MACB_BIT(RE)>
>
> There might be a memory barrier between these two write operations, so add wmb
> to ensure an flip from 0 to 1 for NCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...driver.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Thanks, best regards,
> ---
>
> V2 changes:
>
> Add the same wmb for at91ether as well based on reviewer's suggestion.
>
> Cheers,
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> index 533653b..6d7cfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,7 @@ static irqreturn_t macb_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> if (status & MACB_BIT(RXUBR)) {
> ctrl = macb_readl(bp, NCR);
> macb_writel(bp, NCR, ctrl & ~MACB_BIT(RE));
> + wmb();
> macb_writel(bp, NCR, ctrl | MACB_BIT(RE));
>
> if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_ISR_CLEAR_ON_WRITE)
> @@ -2770,6 +2771,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91ether_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> if (intstatus & MACB_BIT(RXUBR)) {
> ctl = macb_readl(lp, NCR);
> macb_writel(lp, NCR, ctl & ~MACB_BIT(RE));
> + wmb();
> macb_writel(lp, NCR, ctl | MACB_BIT(RE));
> }
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists