| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8760n7h74n.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:00:24 +0100
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Dmitri Epshtein <dima@...vell.com>,
Yelena Krivosheev <yelena@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address
Hi Jisheng,
On lun., nov. 28 2016, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com> wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:30:14 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the
>> cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only
>> which prevents to use the driver on a 64-bits architecture.
>>
>> With this patch the virtual address is stored in an array not shared with
>> the hardware (no more need to use the DMA API). Thanks to this, it is
>> possible to use cache contrary to the access of the rx descriptor member.
>>
>> The change is done in the swbm path only because the hwbm uses the cookie
>> field, this also means that currently the hwbm is not usable in 64-bits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> index 87274d4ab102..b6849f88cab7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> @@ -561,6 +561,9 @@ struct mvneta_rx_queue {
>> u32 pkts_coal;
>> u32 time_coal;
>>
>> + /* Virtual address of the RX buffer */
>> + void **buf_virt_addr;
>
> can we store buf_phys_addr in cacheable memory as well?
Even if we store in in cacheable memory we will still need to store it
in the buffer descriptor as it is used by the hardware.
>
>> +
>> /* Virtual address of the RX DMA descriptors array */
>> struct mvneta_rx_desc *descs;
>>
>> @@ -1573,10 +1576,14 @@ static void mvneta_tx_done_pkts_coal_set(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>>
>> /* Handle rx descriptor fill by setting buf_cookie and buf_phys_addr */
>> static void mvneta_rx_desc_fill(struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc,
>> - u32 phys_addr, u32 cookie)
>> + u32 phys_addr, void *virt_addr,
>> + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
>> {
>> - rx_desc->buf_cookie = cookie;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = phys_addr;
>> + i = rx_desc - rxq->descs;
>> + rxq->buf_virt_addr[i] = virt_addr;
>> }
>>
>> /* Decrement sent descriptors counter */
>> @@ -1781,7 +1788,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mvneta_frag_free);
>>
>> /* Refill processing for SW buffer management */
>> static int mvneta_rx_refill(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>> - struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc)
>> + struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc,
>> + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
>>
>> {
>> dma_addr_t phys_addr;
>> @@ -1799,7 +1807,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_refill(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> - mvneta_rx_desc_fill(rx_desc, phys_addr, (u32)data);
>> + mvneta_rx_desc_fill(rx_desc, phys_addr, data, rxq);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1861,7 +1869,12 @@ static void mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < rxq->size; i++) {
>> struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc = rxq->descs + i;
>> - void *data = (void *)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
>> + void *data;
>> +
>> + if (!pp->bm_priv)
>> + data = rxq->buf_virt_addr[i];
>> + else
>> + data = (void *)(uintptr_t)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
>>
>> dma_unmap_single(pp->dev->dev.parent, rx_desc->buf_phys_addr,
>> MVNETA_RX_BUF_SIZE(pp->pkt_size), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> @@ -1894,12 +1907,13 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
>> unsigned char *data;
>> dma_addr_t phys_addr;
>> u32 rx_status, frag_size;
>> - int rx_bytes, err;
>> + int rx_bytes, err, index;
>>
>> rx_done++;
>> rx_status = rx_desc->status;
>> rx_bytes = rx_desc->data_size - (ETH_FCS_LEN + MVNETA_MH_SIZE);
>> - data = (unsigned char *)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
>> + index = rx_desc - rxq->descs;
>> + data = (unsigned char *)rxq->buf_virt_addr[index];
>> phys_addr = rx_desc->buf_phys_addr;
>>
>> if (!mvneta_rxq_desc_is_first_last(rx_status) ||
>> @@ -1938,7 +1952,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
>> }
>>
>> /* Refill processing */
>> - err = mvneta_rx_refill(pp, rx_desc);
>> + err = mvneta_rx_refill(pp, rx_desc, rxq);
>> if (err) {
>> netdev_err(dev, "Linux processing - Can't refill\n");
>> rxq->missed++;
>> @@ -2020,7 +2034,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_hwbm(struct mvneta_port *pp, int rx_todo,
>> rx_done++;
>> rx_status = rx_desc->status;
>> rx_bytes = rx_desc->data_size - (ETH_FCS_LEN + MVNETA_MH_SIZE);
>> - data = (unsigned char *)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
>> + data = (u8 *)(uintptr_t)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
>> phys_addr = rx_desc->buf_phys_addr;
>> pool_id = MVNETA_RX_GET_BM_POOL_ID(rx_desc);
>> bm_pool = &pp->bm_priv->bm_pools[pool_id];
>> @@ -2708,6 +2722,57 @@ static int mvneta_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> return rx_done;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Refill processing for HW buffer management */
>> +static int mvneta_rx_hwbm_refill(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>> + struct mvneta_rx_desc *rx_desc)
>> +
>> +{
>> + dma_addr_t phys_addr;
>> + void *data;
>> +
>> + data = mvneta_frag_alloc(pp->frag_size);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + phys_addr = dma_map_single(pp->dev->dev.parent, data,
>> + MVNETA_RX_BUF_SIZE(pp->pkt_size),
>> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> + if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(pp->dev->dev.parent, phys_addr))) {
>> + mvneta_frag_free(pp->frag_size, data);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + phys_addr += pp->rx_offset_correction;
>> + rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = phys_addr;
>> + rx_desc->buf_cookie = (uintptr_t)data;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle rxq fill: allocates rxq skbs; called when initializing a port */
>> +static int mvneta_rxq_bm_fill(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>> + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
>> + int num)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> + memset(rxq->descs + i, 0, sizeof(struct mvneta_rx_desc));
>> + if (mvneta_rx_hwbm_refill(pp, rxq->descs + i) != 0) {
>> + netdev_err(pp->dev, "%s:rxq %d, %d of %d buffs filled\n",
>> + __func__, rxq->id, i, num);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add this number of RX descriptors as non occupied (ready to
>> + * get packets)
>> + */
>> + mvneta_rxq_non_occup_desc_add(pp, rxq, i);
>> +
>> + return i;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Handle rxq fill: allocates rxq skbs; called when initializing a port */
>> static int mvneta_rxq_fill(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
>> int num)
>> @@ -2716,7 +2781,7 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_fill(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> memset(rxq->descs + i, 0, sizeof(struct mvneta_rx_desc));
>> - if (mvneta_rx_refill(pp, rxq->descs + i) != 0) {
>> + if (mvneta_rx_refill(pp, rxq->descs + i, rxq) != 0) {
>> netdev_err(pp->dev, "%s:rxq %d, %d of %d buffs filled\n",
>> __func__, rxq->id, i, num);
>> break;
>> @@ -2784,14 +2849,21 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>> mvneta_rxq_buf_size_set(pp, rxq,
>> MVNETA_RX_BUF_SIZE(pp->pkt_size));
>> mvneta_rxq_bm_disable(pp, rxq);
>> +
>> + rxq->buf_virt_addr = devm_kmalloc(pp->dev->dev.parent,
>> + rxq->size * sizeof(void *),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I would suggest allocate this buffer during probe. Otherwise, there's
> memory leak if we either change the mtu or close then open the eth in
> a loop, e.g
>
> while true
> do
> ifconfig eth0 up
> ifconfig eth0 down
> done
Indeed, I will move it.
Thanks,
Gregory
>
> Thanks,
> Jisheng
>
>> + if (!rxq->buf_virt_addr)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mvneta_rxq_fill(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
>> } else {
>> mvneta_rxq_bm_enable(pp, rxq);
>> mvneta_rxq_long_pool_set(pp, rxq);
>> mvneta_rxq_short_pool_set(pp, rxq);
>> + mvneta_rxq_bm_fill(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
>> }
>>
>> - mvneta_rxq_fill(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists