[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161128174710.GE28510@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:47:10 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net/sctp: vmalloc allocation failure in
sctp_setsockopt/xt_alloc_table_info
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree with that. Generally speaking it seems like the right
> thing to do, if you want to avoid filling logs with warnings, but this is the
> sort of error that is going to be accompanied by severe service interruption.
> I'd rather see a reason behind that in the logs, than just have it occur
> silently.
Its not silent -- the setsockopt call will fail and userspace should
display an error.
So I agree with Marcelo, lets suppress the oom spew here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists