[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iLf5JpdzRnjk+TxKVuX2GkLx4-0p8SJb1uxFsKGe0ksg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:39:07 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] idle: add support for tasks that inject idle
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Jacob Pan
<jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Idle injection drivers such as Intel powerclamp and ACPI PAD drivers use
> realtime tasks to take control of CPU then inject idle. There are two
> issues with this approach:
>
> 1. Low efficiency: injected idle task is treated as busy so sched ticks
> do not stop during injected idle period, the result of these
> unwanted wakeups can be ~20% loss in power savings.
>
> 2. Idle accounting: injected idle time is presented to user as busy.
>
> This patch addresses the issues by introducing a new PF_IDLE flag which
> allows any given task to be treated as idle task while the flag is set.
> Therefore, idle injection tasks can run through the normal flow of NOHZ
> idle enter/exit to get the correct accounting as well as tick stop when
> possible.
>
> The implication is that idle task is then no longer limited to PID == 0.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Have you made any changes to the original Peter's patch, or is this
just a resend of that?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists