[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ac2f9e7-f1ee-a2c9-0134-ffaa28c706af@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:55:23 -0500
From: Serguei Sagalovitch <serguei.sagalovitch@....com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
CC: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
"Bridgman, John" <John.Bridgman@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Sander, Ben" <ben.sander@....com>,
"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
"Blinzer, Paul" <Paul.Blinzer@....com>,
"Linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <Linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices
On 2016-11-28 04:36 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> On 28/11/16 12:35 PM, Serguei Sagalovitch wrote:
>> As soon as PeerDirect mapping is called then GPU must not "move" the
>> such memory. It is by PeerDirect design. It is similar how it is works
>> with system memory and RDMA MR: when "get_user_pages" is called then the
>> memory is pinned.
> We haven't touch this in a long time and perhaps it changed, but there
> definitely was a call back in the PeerDirect API to allow the GPU to
> invalidate the mapping. That's what we don't want.
I assume that you are talking about "invalidate_peer_memory()' callback?
I was told that it is the "last resort" because HCA (and driver) is not
able to handle it in the safe manner so it is basically "abort"
everything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists