[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1480374973.18162.103.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:16:13 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net: GPF in eth_header
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 23:19 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> It currently returns -EINVAL in cases where skb wasn't changed/altered
> (e.g. because it doesn't have a fragment header), so we should ACCEPT in
> that case.
>
Maybe nf_ct_frag6_queue() should return direct NF_ codes then ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists