linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location entry type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64389207.3gWh3pGNj9@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:29:39 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <darren.hart@...el.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...nel.org>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location entry type

On Monday, November 28, 2016 05:27:08 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:13:56 +0100
> 
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > Following the kernel Bugzilla discussion during the Kernel Summit
> > (https://lwn.net/Articles/705245/), add bug tracking system location
> > entry type (B) to MAINTAINERS and populate it for several subsystems
> > known to be using the kernel BZ actively (and add the upstream BZ for
> > ACPICA too).
> 
> Applied to the docs tree, thanks.

Linus applied it too:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=686564434e88b67ea8dbbf9150286d04c83bd193

> (We are accumulating a pretty big mess of field types in that file,
> though; at some point we need to think about how much more stuff we want
> to try to cram in there.)

Well, I see your point, but this particular thing was agreed on before.

Thanks,
Rafael