[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161128163948.28ff2fb8@icelake>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:39:48 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] idle: add support for tasks that inject idle
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:33:07 -0800
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > + cpuidle_use_deepest_state(false);
> >
> > This actually depends on your [2/2], doesn't it?
>
> right, I shall put that after 2/2.
I mean reverse the order of the two patches. Should I resend the series
or you can reverse the order?
Thanks,
Jacob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists