linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] builddeb: allow building without headers/firmware packages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0d78b326-96de-06dc-1bba-e8c3a88a27ae@au1.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:06:49 +1100
From:   Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
To:     Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] builddeb: allow building without headers/firmware
 packages

On 25/11/16 23:24, Riku Voipio wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of this patch. It adds some complexity as evident by
> extra indent
> level it adds. On practice developers would end up passing a long command line
> with all KDEB_NO* variables.

That's fair! I think the approach in your new patch is probably better, 
I'll review that.

-- 
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited