[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161129090141.qabvgzjrwd4wd2ql@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:01:41 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:22:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-main.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 91eefaabf102 ("amd-xgbe: Fix unused suspend handlers build warning")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
> bd8255d8ba35 ("amd-xgbe: Prepare for supporting PCI devices")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former)
... except that +#ifdef CONFIG_PM is present in the new
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-platform.c now.
So actually the proper fix is, IMO, to convert:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int xgbe_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
to
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int xgbe_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
so that it doesn't fire again.
David, would you prefer a patch against linux-next?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists