[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161129101112.GG3110@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:11:12 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: move dt props parsing
to cpts driver
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:03:32PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> +static int cpts_of_parse(struct cpts *cpts, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + u32 prop;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpts_clock_mult", &prop))
> + goto of_error;
> + cpts->cc_mult = prop;
Why not set cc.mult here at the same time?
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpts_clock_shift", &prop))
> + goto of_error;
> + cpts->cc.shift = prop;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +of_error:
> + dev_err(cpts->dev, "CPTS: Missing property in the DT.\n");
> + return ret;
> +}
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists