linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] kernel/sysctl.c: return -EINVAL when write invalid val to ulong type sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dcc5a4e2-978e-a087-13b6-43a804eb1934@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:24:21 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To:     <subashab@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] kernel/sysctl.c: return -EINVAL when write invalid val to
 ulong type sysctl



On 2016/11/27 7:15, subashab@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-11-26 02:13, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> ----------------------
>> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> index 706309f..40e9285 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> @@ -2485,10 +2485,14 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void
>> *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
>>                                              sizeof(proc_wspace_sep), NULL);
>>                         if (err)
>>                                 break;
>> -                       if (neg)
>> -                               continue;
>> -                       if ((min && val < *min) || (max && val > *max))
>> -                               continue;
>> +                       if (neg) {
>> +                               err = -EINVAL;
>> +                               break;
>> +                       }
>> +                       if ((min && val < *min) || (max && val > *max)) {
>> +                               err = -EINVAL;
>> +                               break;
>> +                       }
>>                         *i = val;
>>                 } else {
>>                         val = convdiv * (*i) / convmul;
> 
> Agree, this should be similar to proc_douintvec
> 
> root@vm:~# echo 8192 > /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
> root@vm:~# cat /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
> 8192
> root@vm:~# echo -1 > /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> root@vm:~# cat /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
> 8192
> 
Hi,
Thank you for your reply,
then I will write a formal patch to see whether it is acceptable.

Thanks,
Yisheng Xie
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 
> .
>