linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit better

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8EA6D751-36E7-4CEB-8817-1B186A685B96@darmarit.de>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:28:12 +0100
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit better


Am 29.11.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>:

> We already had a super-short blurb, but worth extending it I think:
> We're still pretty far away from anything like a consensus, but
> there's clearly a lot of people who prefer an as-light as possible
> approach to converting existing .txt files to .rst. Make sure this is
> properly taken into account and clear.
> 
> Motivated by discussions with Peter and Christoph and others.
> 
> v2:
> - Mention that existing headings should be kept when converting
> existing .txt files (Mauro).
> - Explain that we prefer :: for quoting code, it's easier on the
> eyes (Mauro).
> - Explain that blindly converting outdated docs is harmful. Motived
> by comments Peter did in our discussion.
> 
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-documentation.rst | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Sorry for my dump remarks ...

* shouldn't it on top of Jon's docs-next?
* should we lose a few words about tabs/indentation?

IMO indentation for reST markup should be 2 spaces, not
tabs (8 spaces). I know about CodeStyling but I think this doc
(markup) and not source-code. Code-examples should be indent
by tabs as usual. BTW here is what CodingStyle says:

 Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig,
 spaces are never used for indentation, and the above example
 is deliberately broken.
 Get a decent editor and don't leave whitespace at the end of
 lines.

... encourages me to prefer spaces.

-- Markus --