[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7018CCEC304@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:15:38 +0000
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
CC: DEVICETREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX-KERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX-PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
LINUX-INPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX-WATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 03/10] Documentation: devicetree: thermal: da9062/61
TJUNC temperature binding
Hi Eduardo,
On 29 November 2016 00:59, Eduardo Valentin, wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:56:37PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > +Optional properties:
> > +
> > +- dlg,tjunc-temp-polling-period-ms : Specify the polling period, measured
> > + in milliseconds, between thermal zone device update checks.
>
> Can you please elaborate on why you need this chip manufacture specific
> property?
>
> Can we use the polling property of already existing in the
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
>
> See the polling properties.
[...]
> > + dlg,tjunc-temp-polling-period-ms = <3000>;
Agreed. There is a polling period built into the thermal core. I've discussed my
reasoning for this decision in answer to your other e-mail. Please refer to the
other discussion thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/29/262
Regards,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists