[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8610e219-8b9a-3010-70b7-b43aaef7cf2b@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:20:10 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function
Hello Brian,
On 11/28/2016 07:19 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>
>
> pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
> case. We use the fall-back only when the first command returns an
> IN_PROGRESS status, which is only used on some EC firmwares where we
> don't want to constantly poll the bus, but instead back off and
> sleep/retry for a little while.
>
That's correct, sorry for missing this when pushing the patch to mainline.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists