linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/urgent] tools/decode_stacktrace.sh: Fix address line detection on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161129132023.GA24321@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:20:23 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@...or.com>,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        koct9i@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        alexander.levin@...izon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kirill@...temov.name, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] tools/decode_stacktrace.sh: Fix address line
 detection on x86


* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:

> Hi tip-bot,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:13:15PM -0800, tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Commit-ID:  8e8d8725d46d93ceffd3e708d905bc101a1905b5
> > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8e8d8725d46d93ceffd3e708d905bc101a1905b5
> > Author:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> > AuthorDate: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:06:35 -0600
> > Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:10:05 +0100
> > 
> > tools/decode_stacktrace.sh: Fix address line detection on x86
> 
> It's actually in the scripts subdir, so: s/tools/scripts/

So that was conscious - it might be in 'scripts' but it is really a tool!

No strong feelings either way.

> Also, while it should be harmless for this to be in 'urgent', I think it
> isn't necessary because it fixes a commit which is currently only in
> tip.

I missed that.

Ok, I rebased it over into tip:x86/asm and fixed the title as well while at it.

Thanks,

	Ingo