[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611291508460.4358@nanos>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:09:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, kernel@...inux.com,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/arm_global_timer: reconfigure clockevents
after cpufreq change
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
> > 29 нояб. 2016 г., в 16:42, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> написал(а):
> >
> > The frequency change would not only affect the clockevent device, it also
> > would affect the clocksource. So the patch is incomplete, but see below.
> Looks like kernel disallow change clocksource and shed_clock rate at
> runtime. I haven’t found any function for that.
>
> > 29 нояб. 2016 г., в 16:42, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> написал(а):
> >
> > That's broken and the clk framework should keep the CORE_PERI clock at a
> > constant rate by reprogramming the divider of the CPU clock.
>
> Thank you for the hint.
>
> > Assumptions w/o real impact are a perfect reason not to apply that
> > patch. This want's a proper proof that the global timer really changes and
> > this hackery is required, which I seriously doubt.
>
> It really changes. It changes like it changes for smp-twd. I guess they are
> driven by same clock CORE_PERI.
If that happens then the whole thing wants to be disabled on those
misconfigured systems and not just hacked for nothing.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists