linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: rework initialization/deinitialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2037427d-0ab6-9446-450d-21c34123c03b@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:50:30 -0600
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: rework
 initialization/deinitialization

Hi Richard,

On 11/29/2016 04:07 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:03:31PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> +int cpts_register(struct cpts *cpts)
>>  {
>>  	int err, i;
>>  
>> -	cpts->info = cpts_info;
>> -	spin_lock_init(&cpts->lock);
>> -
>> -	cpts->cc.read = cpts_systim_read;
>> -	cpts->cc.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
>> -	cpts->cc_mult = mult;
>> -	cpts->cc.mult = mult;
>> -	cpts->cc.shift = shift;
>> -
>>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpts->events);
>>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpts->pool);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < CPTS_MAX_EVENTS; i++)
>>  		list_add(&cpts->pool_data[i].list, &cpts->pool);
>>  
>> -	cpts_clk_init(dev, cpts);
>> +	clk_enable(cpts->refclk);
>> +
>>  	cpts_write32(cpts, CPTS_EN, control);
>>  	cpts_write32(cpts, TS_PEND_EN, int_enable);
>>  
>> +	cpts->cc.mult = cpts->cc_mult;
> 
> It is not clear why you set cc.mult in a different place than
> cc.shift.  That isn't logical, but maybe later patches make it
> clear...

cc.mult has to be reloaded to original value each time CPTS is registered(restarted)
as it can be modified by cpts_ptp_adjfreq().

While cc.shift is static.



> 
>>  	timecounter_init(&cpts->tc, &cpts->cc, ktime_to_ns(ktime_get_real()));
>>  

[...]

>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpts_unregister);
>>  
>> +struct cpts *cpts_create(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs,
>> +			 u32 mult, u32 shift)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpts *cpts;
>> +
>> +	if (!regs || !dev)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> There is no need for this test, as the caller will always pass valid
> pointers.  (This isn't a user space library!)
> 
ok

-- 
regards,
-grygorii