linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00b34def-23f7-7782-b6c8-b2a7449847ea@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:03:26 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

On 11/29/16 9:02 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Humm, I'd prefer 'time_interval' or 'perf_time_interval', plain
> 'interval' doesn't convey what kind if interval is this, we could be
> talking about counter values intervals, etc.

agreed, perf_time_interval makes more sense.