[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161129032212.GA1727@aaronlu.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:22:12 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mremap: move_ptes: check pte dirty after its removal
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 07:06:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is a fix patch, sorry for the trouble.
>
> I don't think you tested this one.. You've now essentially reverted
> 5d1904204c99 entirely by making the new force_flush logic a no-op.
Right, I just did a build test.
Now I'm doing more tests, sorry for being careless.
Regards,
Aaron
>
> > + pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(mm, old_addr, old_pmd);
> > if (pmd_present(*old_pmd) && pmd_dirty(*old_pmd))
> > force_flush = true;
>
> You need to be testing "pmd", not "*old_pmd".
>
> Because now "*old_pmd" will be zeroes.
>
> > if (pte_present(*old_pte) && pte_dirty(*old_pte))
> > force_flush = true;
>
> Similarly here. You need to check "pte", not "*old_pte".
>
> Linus
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists