[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583DCBD4.4010908@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:41:24 -0800
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com, mdf@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] of: Fix issue where code would fall through to
error case.
On 11/27/16 12:20, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> No longer fall through into the error case that prints out
> an error if no error (err = 0) occurred.
>
> Rework error handling to print error where it occured instead
> of having a global catch-all at the end of the function.
>
> Fixes d9181b20a83(of: Add back an error message, restructured)
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
> ---
> Hi Rob, Frank
>
> this has already Frank's Reviewed-by: tag on it, but since I changed around the
> earlier part (before tree_node gets assigned) Frank might wanna take another look
> at this.
< snip >
Hi Moritz,
I agree with Rob's suggested one line solution (that I initially misunderstood).
The one line fix is to add "if (err)" immediately following label "err_out" in
of_resolve_phandles().
As far as patch 2/2, I'm not bothered by the two instances of line over 80 chars.
But if Rob wants to take patch 2/2 I have no objection.
-Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists