[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d72fab48-bcad-8e83-36e7-24d669003f05@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:38:42 -0600
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <brijesh.singh@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of
page walk
On 11/29/2016 12:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -5483,3 +5483,11 @@ void emulator_writeback_register_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>> {
>> writeback_registers(ctxt);
>> }
>> +
>> +bool emulator_is_string_op(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>> +{
>> + if (ctxt->d & String)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>
> Do we really need a full function call for this simple thing? Just because
> this horrible CamelCase constant is in emulate.c?
>
> What's wrong with moving that thing into a header and make it a trivial
> inline:
>
> #define INS_STRING (1 << 13)
>
> static inline bool emulator_is_string_op(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> return ctxt->d & INS_STRING;
> }
>
> Hmm?
One of the recommendation from previous review feedback was to move the
check inside emulator.c. I am fine with inlining it into kvm_emulate.h
Hi Paolo,
Do you want me to spin a new version ?
-Brijesh
>
> tglx
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists