[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161129200711.GF3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:07:11 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:35AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:10:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > It mostly works, most of the time, and that seems to be what Linus
> > > wants, since its really the best we can have given the constraints. But
> > > for debugging, when you have a UART, it totally blows.
> >
> > UART??? They still make those things??? ;-)
>
> Yes, most computer like devices actually have them, trouble is, most
> consumer devices don't have the pins exposed. Luckily most server class
> hardware still does.
>
> And they're absolutely _awesome_ for debugging; getting data out is a
> matter of trivial MMIO poll loops. Rock solid stuff.
They very clearly need to bring the baud rate into the current millenium,
many tens of Mbaud at the -very- least.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists