lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B54333DFB@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:24:08 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [char-msic 2/3] mei: me: fix place for kaby point device ids.



> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:44:45PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > This is fix of the backported patch only, it places KBL DIDs on
> > > correct place to easy on backporting of further DIDs.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5c99f32c461c ('mei: me: add kaby point device ids')
> > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #4.4
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h | 7 ++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > What did I mess up? 

The KBL DIDs were moved to a different part of the file during back port, than in the original patch hence the consequent 
patches will not apply cleanly.

 And what tree is this for?
> 
> >
> > Still confused,
> >
> This is for 4.4 stable, not sure where I broke the protocol but according  the
> stable rules
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #4.4 this should indicate the intention.
> 
> Thanks
> Tomas
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ