linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: touchscreen: edt_ft5x06 - change msleep to usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOXgUe1MULGQZJ=pNsSKrvVcCFptVn5b2Qafjao1_xrxVYn0JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:24:17 +0530
From:   Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@...sung.com>
To:     simon.budig@...nelconcepts.de, daniel.wagener@...nelconcepts.de,
        LW@...o-electronics.de,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     s.samuel@...sung.com, r.mahale@...sung.com,
        Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@...il.com>,
        Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: touchscreen: edt_ft5x06 - change msleep to
 usleep_range for small msecs

Dear Simon Budig / Daniel Wagener / Lothar Waßmann,

Greetings!

I am Aniroop Mathur from Samsung R&D Institute, India.

I have submitted one patch as below for review to Linux Open Source.
The problem is that we do not have the hardware available with us to
test it and we would like to test it before actually applying it.
As you are the author of this driver, I am contacting you to request you to
provide your feedback upon this patch.

Also if you have the hardware available, could you please help to
test this patch on your hardware? or could you provide contact points
of individuals who could support to test it?

Thank you!

BR,
Aniroop Mathur

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@...sung.com> wrote:
> msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and will often sleep longer.
> (~20 ms actual sleep for any value given in the 1~20ms range)
> This is not the desired behaviour for many cases like device resume time,
> device suspend time, device enable time, retry logic, etc.
> Thus, change msleep to usleep_range for precise wakeups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> index 703e295..379dd31 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
>  #define EDT_SWITCH_MODE_RETRIES                10
>  #define EDT_SWITCH_MODE_DELAY          5 /* msec */
>  #define EDT_RAW_DATA_RETRIES           100
> -#define EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY             1 /* msec */
> +#define EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY             1000 /* usec */
>
>  enum edt_ver {
>         M06,
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static ssize_t edt_ft5x06_debugfs_raw_data_read(struct file *file,
>         }
>
>         do {
> -               msleep(EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY);
> +               usleep_range(EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY, EDT_RAW_DATA_DELAY + 100);
>                 val = edt_ft5x06_register_read(tsdata, 0x08);
>                 if (val < 1)
>                         break;
> --
> 2.6.2
>