lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAR7FAH2i7i0iJGCXbrDgpD==b3Rcj6wRjaKuQ+voWTFLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:11:53 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/39] mtd: nand: denali: support 64bit capable DMA engine

Hi Boris,

2016-11-28 1:16 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
>
> If you follow my suggestions of definition function pointers, you'll
> just have to add a function pointer to the denali_caps struct:
>
>         void (*setup_dma)(struct denali_nand_info *denali, int op);
>


This is possible because both 32B and 64B variants have
the same function prototype.


However, I am not keen on doing so for ecc_handle(),
so, at this moment, I am not keen on doing so only for setup_dma() either.

If I see more cases that fit in callback handler approach,
I will think about switching to it with consistency.

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ