[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAR7FAH2i7i0iJGCXbrDgpD==b3Rcj6wRjaKuQ+voWTFLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:11:53 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/39] mtd: nand: denali: support 64bit capable DMA engine
Hi Boris,
2016-11-28 1:16 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
>
> If you follow my suggestions of definition function pointers, you'll
> just have to add a function pointer to the denali_caps struct:
>
> void (*setup_dma)(struct denali_nand_info *denali, int op);
>
This is possible because both 32B and 64B variants have
the same function prototype.
However, I am not keen on doing so for ecc_handle(),
so, at this moment, I am not keen on doing so only for setup_dma() either.
If I see more cases that fit in callback handler approach,
I will think about switching to it with consistency.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists