[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161130092730.794602111@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:29:59 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 22/37] thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
commit ec638db8cb9ddd5ca08b23f2835b6c9c15eb616d upstream.
Commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 replaced module
cpu id table with a cpu feature check, which is logically correct.
But we need the module device table to allow module auto loading.
Fixes:3105f234 thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -669,9 +669,16 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
};
+static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
+ { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
+
static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
{
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
+
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT");
return -ENODEV;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists