linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 36/37] can: bcm: fix support for CAN FD frames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161130092731.349788456@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:30:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 36/37] can: bcm: fix support for CAN FD frames

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

commit 5499a6b22e5508b921c447757685b0a5e40a07ed upstream.

Since commit 6f3b911d5f29b98 ("can: bcm: add support for CAN FD frames") the
CAN broadcast manager supports CAN and CAN FD data frames.

As these data frames are embedded in struct can[fd]_frames which have a
different length the access to the provided array of CAN frames became
dependend of op->cfsiz. By using a struct canfd_frame pointer for the array of
CAN frames the new offset calculation based on op->cfsiz was accidently applied
to CAN FD frame element lengths.

This fix makes the pointer to the arrays of the different CAN frame types a
void pointer so that the offset calculation in bytes accesses the correct CAN
frame elements.

Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147980658909653

Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/can/bcm.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
 		     (CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG) : \
 		     (CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG))
 
-#define CAN_BCM_VERSION "20160617"
+#define CAN_BCM_VERSION "20161123"
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PF_CAN broadcast manager protocol");
 MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
@@ -109,8 +109,9 @@ struct bcm_op {
 	u32 count;
 	u32 nframes;
 	u32 currframe;
-	struct canfd_frame *frames;
-	struct canfd_frame *last_frames;
+	/* void pointers to arrays of struct can[fd]_frame */
+	void *frames;
+	void *last_frames;
 	struct canfd_frame sframe;
 	struct canfd_frame last_sframe;
 	struct sock *sk;
@@ -681,7 +682,7 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buf
 
 	if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) {
 		/* the easiest case */
-		bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, &op->last_frames[0], rxframe);
+		bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, op->last_frames, rxframe);
 		goto rx_starttimer;
 	}
 
@@ -1068,7 +1069,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_h
 
 		if (msg_head->nframes) {
 			/* update CAN frames content */
-			err = memcpy_from_msg((u8 *)op->frames, msg,
+			err = memcpy_from_msg(op->frames, msg,
 					      msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz);
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
@@ -1118,7 +1119,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_h
 		}
 
 		if (msg_head->nframes) {
-			err = memcpy_from_msg((u8 *)op->frames, msg,
+			err = memcpy_from_msg(op->frames, msg,
 					      msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz);
 			if (err < 0) {
 				if (op->frames != &op->sframe)
@@ -1163,6 +1164,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_h
 	/* check flags */
 
 	if (op->flags & RX_RTR_FRAME) {
+		struct canfd_frame *frame0 = op->frames;
 
 		/* no timers in RTR-mode */
 		hrtimer_cancel(&op->thrtimer);
@@ -1174,8 +1176,8 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_h
 		 * prevent a full-load-loopback-test ... ;-]
 		 */
 		if ((op->flags & TX_CP_CAN_ID) ||
-		    (op->frames[0].can_id == op->can_id))
-			op->frames[0].can_id = op->can_id & ~CAN_RTR_FLAG;
+		    (frame0->can_id == op->can_id))
+			frame0->can_id = op->can_id & ~CAN_RTR_FLAG;
 
 	} else {
 		if (op->flags & SETTIMER) {