[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59bf4f3c-34ab-5cbc-9579-f1a8648804ea@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:16:12 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmattson@...gle.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: nVMX: generate non-true VMX MSRs based on
true versions
On 30/11/2016 03:14, David Matlack wrote:
> The "non-true" VMX capability MSRs can be generated from their "true"
> counterparts, by OR-ing the default1 bits. The default1 bits are fixed
> and defined in the SDM.
>
> Since we can generate the non-true VMX MSRs from the true versions,
> there's no need to store both in struct nested_vmx. This also lets
> userspace avoid having to restore the non-true MSRs.
>
> Note this does not preclude emulating MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC[55]=0. To do so,
> we simply need to set all the default1 bits in the true MSRs (such that
> the true MSRs and the generated non-true MSRs are equal).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 5382b82..0beb56a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -446,19 +446,21 @@ struct nested_vmx {
> u16 vpid02;
> u16 last_vpid;
>
> + /*
> + * We only store the "true" versions of the VMX capability MSRs. We
> + * generate the "non-true" versions by setting the must-be-1 bits
> + * according to the SDM.
> + */
> u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high;
> - u32 nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high;
> u32 nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high;
> u32 nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high;
> - u32 nested_vmx_true_exit_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high;
> - u32 nested_vmx_true_entry_ctls_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_misc_low;
> u32 nested_vmx_misc_high;
> u32 nested_vmx_ept_caps;
> @@ -2712,9 +2714,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |= VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS;
>
> /* We support free control of debug control saving. */
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_exit_ctls_low =
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low &
> - ~VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low &= ~VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
>
> /* entry controls */
> rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS,
> @@ -2733,9 +2733,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS;
>
> /* We support free control of debug control loading. */
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_entry_ctls_low =
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low &
> - ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
>
> /* cpu-based controls */
> rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS,
> @@ -2768,8 +2766,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS;
>
> /* We support free control of CR3 access interception. */
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low =
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low &
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low &=
> ~(CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING | CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING);
>
> /* secondary cpu-based controls */
> @@ -2868,36 +2865,32 @@ static int vmx_get_vmx_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
> *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high);
> + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS)
> + *pdata |= PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
Almost: PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR must be
added to both the low and high parts. Likewise below.
I guess you can use vmx_control_msr to generate it, too.
Paolo
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS:
> - *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high);
> - break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS:
> *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high);
> + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS)
> + *pdata |= CPU_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_EXIT_CTLS:
> - *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_exit_ctls_low,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high);
> - break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS:
> *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high);
> + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS)
> + *pdata |= VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
> - *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_entry_ctls_low,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high);
> - break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
> *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high);
> + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS)
> + *pdata |= VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> break;
> case MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC:
> *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> @@ -10184,7 +10177,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
> }
>
> if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low,
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high) ||
> !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low,
> @@ -10193,10 +10186,10 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high) ||
> !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_exit_ctls_low,
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high) ||
> !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls,
> - vmx->nested.nested_vmx_true_entry_ctls_low,
> + vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low,
> vmx->nested.nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high))
> {
> nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists