linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:07:41 +0100
From:   "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver

Hi,


2016-11-30 17:23 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>:
> Hi,
>
>> I was too busy in another project but now I am ready to complete the
>> upstream of the STM32F4 I2C driver.
>
> Nice.
>
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_set_periph_clk_freq(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     u32 clk_rate, cr2, freq;
>> >> +
>> >> +     cr2 = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> >> +     cr2 &= ~STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK;
>> >> +
>> >> +     clk_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c_dev->clk);
>> >> +     freq = clk_rate / MHZ_TO_HZ;
>> >> +
>> >> +     if (freq > STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ)
>> >> +             freq = STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ;
>> >> +     if (freq < STM32F4_I2C_MIN_FREQ)
>> >> +             freq = STM32F4_I2C_MIN_FREQ;
>> >
>> > clamp() to enforce the range?
>> Sorry but what do you mean by "clamp()" ?
>
> The kernel has a clamp() function which would fit this purpose, I think.
Ok I got it. I will fix it in the V4.
Thanks

>
> Regards,
>
>    Wolfram
>