[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161130203011.GB15989@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:30:11 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marc MERLIN <marc@...lins.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of
RAM that should be free
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:14:50AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Tejun/Kent - any way to just limit the workqueue depth for bcache?
> Because that really isn't helping, and things *will* time out and
> cause those problems when you have hundreds of IO's queued on a disk
> that likely as a write iops around ~100..
Yeah, easily. I'm assuming it's gonna be the bcache_wq allocated in
from bcache_init(). It's currently using 0 as @max_active and it can
set to be any arbitrary number. It'd be a very crude way to control
what looks like a buffer bloat with IOs tho. We can make it a bit
more granular by splitting workqueues per bcache instance / purpose
but for the long term the right solution seems to be hooking into
writeback throttling mechanism that block layer just grew recently.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists