[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161130133358.d508cc8931be6f08ee88561f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:33:58 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <acme@...hat.com>,
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<bristot@...hat.com>, <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
<dcashman@...gle.com>, <w@....eu>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl: return -EINVAL if write invalid val to
ulong type sysctl
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:30:52 +0800 Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com> wrote:
> I tried to echo an invalid value to an unsigned long type sysctl on
> 4.9.0-rc6:
> linux:~# cat /proc/sys/vm/user_reserve_kbytes
> 131072
> linux:~# echo -1 > /proc/sys/vm/user_reserve_kbytes
> linux:~# cat /proc/sys/vm/user_reserve_kbytes
> 131072
>
> The echo operation got error and the value do not write to
> user_reserve_kbytes, however, user do not know it until checking
> the value again.
>
> This patch return -EINVAL when write an invalid value to unsigned
> long type sysctl to make user know what happened without
> checking its value once more, just as what proc_douintvec do.
hmpf.
# echo 18446744073709551615 > /proc/sys/vm/user_reserve_kbytes
# cat /proc/sys/vm/user_reserve_kbytes
18446744073709551615
I think that when taking in an unsigned long the kernel should simply
treat -1 as 0xffffffff (or 0xffffffffffffffff). It's natural and
normal and everyone knows what it means?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists