[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F0C2F3CA-7A29-46B5-B420-A672696236BF@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:40:22 +0300
From: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, wxt@...k-chips.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: document how to setup rockchip timers as clocksource
> 1 дек. 2016 г., в 0:30, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> написал(а):
>
> 1st and 2nd are ambiguous. Plus this is an OS implementation detail that
> doesn't belong in the binding.
>
>> +If you want to bind specific timer as clockevent (i.e. one from alive subsystem)
>> +and specific timer as clocksource, you can number the timers in "aliases" node.
>
> No.
>
> Use and/or describe what are the features of a timer to make the
> decision. There has to be some reason you care which one. One has an
> interrupt and the other doesn't. One is always on. Etc.
Thank you, Rob.
Eventually I abandoned this decision.
I left only one patch, which you confirmed recently.
And sorry for making noise with duplicate patches.
Alexander.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists