[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201003222.ih3lxuyfv7xyaget@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:32:22 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Meng Yi <meng.yi@....com>
Cc: "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rtc/nxp: add FTM alarm driver as the wakeup source
On 02/11/2016 at 08:23:32 +0000, Meng Yi wrote :
> > +
> > +static int ftm_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int
> > +enabled) {
> > + if (enabled)
> > + ftm_irq_enable(true);
> > + else
> > + ftm_irq_enable(false);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nxp_ftm_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time
> > +*tm) {
> > + struct timeval time;
> > + unsigned long local_time;
> > +
> > + do_gettimeofday(&time);
> > + local_time = (u32)(time.tv_sec - (sys_tz.tz_minuteswest * 60));
> > + rtc_time_to_tm(local_time, tm);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> This is not really getting time from the RTC since FTM is not a RTC device,
> But we need to get the time to setup alarm, so we are using system time for now.
> Anybody have better idea?
>
No, that seems fine to me. I'll review the rest of the driver.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists