linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <583FAF71.7070708@windriver.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:04:49 +0800
From:   yjin <yanjiang.jin@...driver.com>
To:     Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        <paulus@...ba.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC:     <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <jinyanjiang@...il.com>, <yanjiang.jin@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your reminder!
I rephrased it as below:

-#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct) cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))
+#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)       \
+       (u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct)))


and rebuilt the kernel, no warnings found.
New patch is attached, could you also help me to review it?

Regards!
Yanjiang

On 2016年11月30日 22:40, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 12:56 +0800, yanjiang.jin@...driver.com wrote:
>> From: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@...driver.com>
>>
>> This patch is to avoid the below warning:
>>
>> kernel/sched/cpuacct.c:298:25: warning:
>> format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int',
>> but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@...driver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> index 4f60db0..4423e97 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static inline cputime_t clock_t_to_cputime(const
>> unsigned long clk)
>>   	return (__force cputime_t) ct;
>>   }
>>   
>> -#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))
>> +#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	\
>> +	(__force u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct)))
> Why is __force needed?
>
> -Scott
>


View attachment "0001-powerpc-cputime-fix-a-compile-warning.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1138 bytes)