linux-kernel - Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers 2016-11-29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87vav4rzu0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:19:19 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers 2016-11-29

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:59:44 +0200
>
>> if there's still time here's one more patch to 3.9. I think this is good
>> to have in 3.9 as it fixes an issue where we were printing uninitialised
>> memory in mwifiex. I had this in wireless-drivers already for some time
>> as I was waiting for other fixes and nothing serious actually came up.
>> 
>> If this doesn't make it to 3.9 that's not a problem, I'll just merge
>> this to wireless-drivers-next. Let me know what you prefer.
>
> Unless you are in a time-machine of some sort I assume you mean "4.9" not
> "3.9" :-)
>
> Pulled, thanks.

Hah, I have no idea where I came up with this "3.9" :) I was trying mean
"4.9" of course, thanks for pulling.

-- 
Kalle Valo