[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201055235.GG3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:52:35 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:13:03PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This question was probably intended for other folks, but I should point
> out that idle tasks *do* invoke the scheduler.  cpu_idle_loop() calls
> schedule_preempt_disabled().
Right, but that doesn't matter I think. The below will simply not call
rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() from the idle task, which would be
fine I think.
> > So is the following a sensible approach, or should I look elsewhere?
> > 
> > 	#define cond_resched_rcu_qs() \
> > 	do { \
> > 		if (!is_idle_task(current) && !cond_resched()) \
> > 			rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current); \
You should reverse your conditions though:
		if (!cond_resched() && !is_idle_task(current))
			rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
That way we'll still do cond_resched() and you only gate the RCU call.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists