[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161130175129.5ab7158f@lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:51:29 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] core-api ReST: assoc_array, atomic_ops,
local_ops
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:30:52 +0100
Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com> wrote:
> Some more ReSTification of core-api's: assoc_array, atomic_ops and local_ops. A
> fourth patch removes a warning about a bullet list without ending at
> firmware_class.c
OK, I've merged patches 1-3. Peter, if you ever want to edit atomic_ops,
just send it meward when you're done and I'll deal with any formatting
issues.
Silvio, if you wanted to take this further, the assoc_array code is
nicely decorated with kerneldoc comments; using those in the
documentation would be a nice thing. There are some kerneldoc comments
for the atomic functions, but that seems rather more erratic.
Part 4 (firmware_class.c) is a bit off my turf, so I don't think I can
apply it. From what I can tell looking at the history, Andrew Morton
might be a logical target for that patch.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists