[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201092228.calajwwv4k4k4l6f@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:22:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/asm: Change sync_core() to use MOV to CR2 to
serialize
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:34:55PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Aside from being excessively slow, CPUID is problematic: Linux runs
> on a handful of CPUs that don't have CPUID. MOV to CR2 is always
> available, so use it instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Looks nice.
I'm wondering if we should leave this one in tip for an additional cycle
to have it tested on more hw. I know, it is architectural and so on but
who knows what every implementation actually does...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists